shelby3

Resolving the EW theory inconsistencies

BITSTAMP:BTCUSD   Bitcoin
This is a reaction to Alessio Rastani’s Youtube EW theory analysis of Bitcoin. I explained that he had inconsistencies in my comments on this video.

This the only resolution to all the inconsistencies that makes complete sense to me.


Thus non-legacy Bitcoin is attacked from February 2021 peak ~$75 –85k. Legacy Bitcoin continues upward. This explains the ~$8k ETH and $9+ projection for Cardano (ADA) for February, then ETH crashing to $1200 probably due to the proof-of-stake Merge and heat death of it’s proof-of-work miners (who will presumably fork creating a free airdrop which is income taxable).

I think the proof-of-stake altcoins will bounce back. Non-legacy Bitcoin may bounce back somewhat. But then perhaps come the cyberattacks that the World Economic Forum has been warning us about. We will know all proof-of-work altcoins can be destroyed with the repetitive mining difficulty attacks. Proof-of-stake altcoins can perhaps be disrupted with DDoS attacks because their delegated stakers (e.g. DPoS) are permissioned and few in number.
Declinazione di responsabilità

Le informazioni ed i contenuti pubblicati non costituiscono in alcun modo una sollecitazione ad investire o ad operare nei mercati finanziari. Non sono inoltre fornite o supportate da TradingView. Maggiori dettagli nelle Condizioni d'uso.