linear grow in log scale doesnt fit the direction ...
... we are pointing at
If we stay at the current grow rate we get to 100k$ at 2030:
this linked image shows it in normal scale.
this published idea here shows this linear grow to 100k$ in log scale (blue)
--> meaning our current grow rate is still low, because we would make a sharp break in log scale when we follow the linear blue path
(hope i could explain my idea so that it can be understood)
If we stay at the current grow rate we get to 100k$ at 2030:
this published idea here shows this linear grow to 100k$ in log scale (blue)
--> meaning our current grow rate is still low, because we would make a sharp break in log scale when we follow the linear blue path
(hope i could explain my idea so that it can be understood)
Commento:
isnt it great to watch back at your old ideas and see that they fit :D
Commento:
Still fit :D