GuruFocusGuruFocus

Is The Kraft Heinz Company a Value Trap or Dividend Gem?

11 minuti di lettura

Kraft Heinz Business Empire: From Ketchup to Kraft Mac & Cheese

The Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ: KHC) is a leading global food and beverage company formed in 2015 through the merger of Kraft Foods Group and H.J. Heinz. The company owns 200+ iconic brands (Heinz ketchup, Kraft cheese and Mac & Cheese, Oscar Mayer meats, Philadelphia cream cheese, Jell-O, Velveeta, Kool-Aid, etc.) and operates worldwide. In 2023, KHC generated roughly $27 billion in net sales. Headquartered in Chicago and Pittsburgh, its business spans condiments, sauces, cheese, meats, snacks, and beverages, serving retail, foodservice, and away-from-home channels. Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)) and 3G Capital spearheaded the merger, with Berkshire currently the largest shareholder. (Buffett himself has admitted that the KraftHeinz merger underperformed, saying he overpaid for Kraft.) As of mid-2025, Kraft Heinz was the #5 global food/beverage company by sales. Its broad portfolio and strong brands have historically generated stable cash flow, but recent years have seen margin pressures and stagnant volumes across the industry.

Q2 2025 Earnings: Revenue Decline but EPS Beats Wall Street Estimates

In Q2 2025, Kraft Heinz reported net sales of $6.35 billion, a 1.9% decline year-over-year. Organic sales (excluding FX and portfolio changes) were down ~2%.The company posted a GAAP operating loss of $8.0 billion (due to a one-time $9.3 billion non-cash impairment charge), but on an adjusted basis, operating income was $1.3 billion (down 7.5% YoY). Adjusted EPS was $0.69, beating the analyst consensus of $0.64, though this was 11.5% lower YoY. Gross profit margins compressed: GAAP gross margin fell to ~34.4% (100 basis points below the prior year). The GAAP net loss was $7.82 billion (mainly from the write-down), but adjusted net income was $1.57 billion (down from $1.79B prior), implying an adjusted net margin around 25%. Free cash flow was robust, about $1.50 billion in the quarter (up 28.5% YoY), reflecting working capital improvements and cost controls.

Kraft Heinz Stock Reaction: Flat Trading Despite Earnings Beat

KHC stock currently trades around $27 (early Sep 2025), near its 52-week low of ~$25.44 and well below its prior ~ $36 high. Year-to-date, the share price is down significantly (by roughly 25%) as the market digests slowing growth and strategic changes. Since the Q2 report in late July, KHC has been roughly flat (+0.7%), lagging the broader market. Its forward dividend yield is about 5.8% (one of the highest in the consumer staples sector), which has helped stabilize demand among income-oriented investors. In summary, KHC's recent performance is middling, with earnings slightly above expectations, but persistent sales/margin declines leave investors cautious.

Short-Term Outlook: Inflation, Volumes, and Dividend Stability in Focus

Looking ahead to the remainder of 2025, Kraft Heinz has reaffirmed its full-year guidance and remains confident in its ability to navigate a complex consumer environment. The company expects organic net sales to decline between 1.5% and 3.5% for the full year, reflecting softer volumes in certain categories but also continued strength in core global brands. Management reiterated its commitment to disciplined pricing and promotional strategies designed to balance competitiveness with profitability.

On the earnings side, Kraft Heinz projects adjusted EPS in the range of $2.51 to $2.67 for the year, supported by cost efficiencies, supply chain improvements, and productivity initiatives across the portfolio. Importantly, the company continues to target a free cash flow conversion rate above 90%, underscoring its strong cash generation profile. This provides ample financial flexibility to fund the dividend, reduce debt, and invest in brand support initiatives.

Management also highlighted its focus on brand-building investments, innovation pipelines, and operational execution. Increased marketing spend in the first half of the year has already contributed to stronger brand equity rankings, and similar investments will continue to drive consumer engagement. Despite volume pressures in some North American grocery categories, Kraft Heinz remains confident that its combination of strong brands, operational discipline, and resilient free cash flow will allow it to deliver on its 2025 objectives.

Strategic Shake-Up: Kraft Heinz's Spin-Off Into Two Companies

In September 2025, Kraft Heinz unveiled its boldest restructuring move since the landmark 2015 merger between Kraft Foods Group and H.J. Heinz. The company announced plans to split into two independent, publicly traded entities by late 2026, a decision management says will simplify operations, sharpen strategic focus, and ultimately unlock shareholder value. The breakup is designed to separate Kraft Heinz's faster-growing, globally oriented businesses from its slower-moving, largely North American staples.

The first company, to be called Global Taste Elevation Co., will house the brands with stronger international resonance and higher growth potential. This unit includes Heinz ketchup and sauces, Philadelphia cream cheese, Kraft Mac & Cheese, and Classico sauces, among others. In 2024, these businesses generated approximately $15.4 billion in sales, supported by a broad geographic reach across Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Its product portfolio skews toward categories like condiments and sauces, which are growing faster than traditional packaged grocery, and the company historically enjoys operating margins in the mid- to high-20s.

The second company, provisionally named North American Grocery Co., will primarily consist of U.S. and Canadian staples, including Oscar Mayer meats, Lunchables, Kraft Singles, Kool-Aid, Jell-O, and Maxwell House coffee. In 2024, this business generated about $10.4 billion in sales, but its categories tend to be mature or in outright decline, particularly cold cuts and powdered beverages. Operating margins here are thinner, typically in the mid-teens, reflecting lower growth and higher competitive pressures from private labelspp.

Management has confirmed that both entities will retain investment-grade credit ratings and target leverage around 2.5x net debt-to-EBITDA. Importantly, Kraft Heinz committed to sustaining the combined dividend, which currently stands at $1.60 per share annuallya yield of about 5.8% at current prices. Post spin-off, the dividend is expected to be split between the two companies. A reasonable scenario would allocate $1.00 per share to Global Taste Elevation, implying a yield of 3.6% at an estimated $28 stock price, and $0.60 per share to North American Grocery, equating to a 4.2% yield at a $14 stock price. This assurance has been critical in maintaining support from income-focused investors.

A closer look at valuations highlights why management believes the breakup can unlock significant upside. Assuming Global Taste Elevation delivers $15.4 billion in sales and a 25% EBITDA margin, EBITDA would reach roughly $3.85 billion. Comparable companies in condiments and saucessuch as McCormicktrade at about 1213x EV/EBITDA. At 12x, Global Taste Elevation would be valued at around $46 billion EV; subtracting ~$10 billion of debt, equity would be about $36 billion, or $32 per share based on 1.1 billion shares outstanding.

Meanwhile, North American Grocery, with $10.4 billion in sales and a 15% EBITDA margin, would generate about $1.56 billion in EBITDA. Using an 8.5x multiple, consistent with mature packaged food peers like General Mills and Conagra, the implied enterprise value is about $13.3 billion. After accounting for ~$6 billion in net debt, the equity value comes to roughly $7.3 billion, or $6.60 per share. Adding both pieces together suggests a combined implied value of about $38.60 per share, compared to Kraft Heinz's current trading level around $27. That equates to a potential 43% upside if execution is successful and both businesses trade at peer multiples.

Valuation Scenarios: What the Spin-Off Could Be Worth

To understand how these peer multiples translate into shareholder value, we've modeled three scenarios: bull, base, and bear. These projections reflect different assumptions about what multiples the market may assign to the post-spin companies and how much debt will sit on each balance sheet.

Interpreting the Range

What emerges from this valuation framework is that the upside potential from the spin-off is highly dependent on how the North American Grocery unit is perceived and valued by the market. If investors assign it a low multiple as they often do for declining packaged food categories it could drag down the total value proposition of the entire separation.

On the other hand, if Global Taste Elevation is able to sustain premium margins and command a valuation in line with peers like McCormick, it could carry most of the weight in driving share price appreciation.

For dividend-focused investors, the combined yield (around 5.8%) remains attractive, and management's commitment to maintaining the total payout across both companies is reassuring. But for value-seeking or growth-oriented investors, the question remains whether the spin-off can catalyze a structural re-rating of Kraft Heinz's brand portfolio or simply reorganize two low-growth businesses under different tickers.

Breaking Down the Spin-Off: How Kraft Heinz's Two Future Companies Compare to Peers

In order to assess whether Kraft Heinz's 2026 spin-off could truly unlock shareholder value, investors need more than just theoretical upside projections. The key lies in benchmarking each of the two future standalone companies Global Taste Elevation Co. and North American Grocery Co. against their most relevant public comparables. This approach allows us to evaluate whether the valuation multiples being assumed in bull-case scenarios are grounded in market reality, or overly optimistic.

Peer Comparison: Metrics That Matter

Let's begin with the Global Taste Elevation segment. This business will house Kraft Heinz's more internationally oriented and faster-growing brands, such as Heinz sauces, Kraft Mac & Cheese, Philadelphia cream cheese, and Classico pasta sauces. It is expected to generate about $15.4 billion in revenue with an estimated EBITDA margin of 25%. Based on management commentary and brand positioning, it competes most directly with companies like McCormick (NYSE: MKC) and select segments of Hormel's (NYSE: HRL) international and sauces businesses.

On the other hand, the North American Grocery business will include legacy, slower-growth brands like Oscar Mayer meats, Kool-Aid, Jell-O, and Maxwell House. With $10.4 billion in sales and EBITDA margins closer to 15%, its peer set includes more mature food companies like General Mills (NYSE: GIS), Conagra Brands (NYSE: CAG), and domestic-facing parts of Hormel.

This benchmarking offers a more nuanced perspective on Kraft Heinz's valuation assumptions:

The Global Taste Elevation unit has an EBITDA margin profile that is actually superior to McCormick and Hormel's international operations. It's true that McCormick's top-line growth is slightly better, but Taste Elevation's broader brand mix and global reach could support a 12x EV/EBITDA multiple, particularly if the company continues investing in marketing and innovation.By contrast, the North American Grocery unit appears weaker. It has lower margins, slower growth, and brand categories (powdered beverages, cold cuts, processed cheese) that are not favored by health-conscious or value-seeking consumers. Peers like General Mills and Conagra both of which are better diversified and operate in more resilient categories trade at 911x EV/EBITDA. Therefore, Kraft Heinz's assumption of 8.5x for the Grocery unit may be too generous. A more realistic multiple could be closer to 6.5x7x, or even lower in a market downturn.

Next Step: Market Sentiment and Execution

While spin-offs often enjoy initial investor enthusiasm, the long-term success of this breakup hinges on execution. Global Taste Elevation will need to demonstrate growth through international expansion and innovation, while North American Grocery must show operational discipline and perhaps even M&A-driven restructuring. If execution falters, or if the market doubts Grocery's standalone relevance, the stock could remain stuck in value-trap territory.

Still, the numbers suggest a thoughtful investor can build a thesis around Kraft Heinz with a clear understanding of the risk/reward tradeoff. The spin-off isn't guaranteed to unlock value but it meaningfully changes the conversation.

Guru Moves: Buffett, Watsa, and Hedge Funds Bet on Kraft Heinz

Notably, well-known investors have sizable positions in KHC. Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s Berkshire Hathaway remains the largest shareholder, owning about 325.6 million shares (27.5% of the company) as of June 30, 2025. Buffett (and Berkshire) has made only modest trades recently (selling ~1.5M shares at ~$53 in the past) and publicly stated the Kraft/Heinz deal was a misstep. Other value-focused investors are active: Prem Watsa (Trades, Portfolio)'s Fairfax Financial holds roughly 4.88 million KHC shares (6.4% of Fairfax's $1.84B U.S. portfolio) and increased its stake by 45% in Q2 2025. Prominent hedge funds also moved: O'Shaughnessy Asset Management (quant fund) lifted its KHC stake by +235% to 692K shares ($18M), and DE Shaw (quant) added 121% to about 1.15M shares ($30M). These transactions suggest some investors see KHC as undervalued. By contrast, corporate insiders have largely been net sellers. In Q1/Q2 2025, multiple directors (including Chair Miguel Patricio) sold shares: e.g., Patricio sold ~72K shares in Q1, and director Elio Leoni Sceti sold ~50K in early summer. These insider sales appear to be trimming or stock awards rather than dramatic de-risking, but they do signal that leadership is not aggressively buying. Overall, GuruFocus's big money players are showing mixed signals; Buffett and Fairfax hold large stakes with relatively steady exposures, whereas some hedge funds have quietly increased positions amid this reset.

Valuation Deep Dive: Forward P/E vs. 5-Year Average and Peer Comparison

KHC stock trades at a multi-year low valuation. The forward P/E is roughly 1011, compared to a historic 5-year average in the mid-teens (industry average). This depressed multiple reflects the market's low growth expectations. Correspondingly, the earnings yield (~910%) and high dividend (5.8%) make KHC attractive as an income/value play. For context, the stock's 52-week range is ~$2536, implying it's now near its low point despite cash flows being solid. On a price/book basis, KHC trades around 2.5 (reflecting a strong balance sheet and brand value), and its 5-year average PEG (forward P/E to growth) is high given weak projected growth. Compared to peers, KHC's yields and margins are above average (peers often have a 23% yield), but revenue growth is slower. Overall, valuation is below historical norms, as many investors see KHC as cheap, with value metrics suggesting the upside potential if performance stabilizes. However, analysts note that value traps are possible if fundamental headwinds persist.

Final Word: Spin-Off Could Unlock ValueBut Only if the Market Buys the Story

Kraft Heinz today stands at a strategic crossroads. For years, it has been viewed as a lumbering giant in the packaged food industryrich in brand equity, but stuck in categories increasingly out of sync with modern consumer preferences. Its share price has reflected that skepticism, languishing near decade lows, despite generating strong free cash flow and offering one of the sector's most generous dividend yields.

Now, the planned 2026 spin-off offers a rare inflection point. By breaking itself into two more focused companiesGlobal Taste Elevation Co. and North American Grocery Co.Kraft Heinz is attempting to reposition its corporate identity and unlock trapped value. The logic is clear: let the faster-growing international condiments and sauces business command a premium multiple, while the slower, cash-rich grocery unit runs independently with its own capital allocation priorities.

Our deeper peer comparison suggests this thesis has meritbut also real risk. Global Taste Elevation stacks up well against peers like McCormick and Hormel's sauces segment, with comparable margins and brand depth. Assigning it a 12x EV/EBITDA multiple is plausible, especially if the business continues to invest in innovation, expands internationally, and maintains premium pricing power. At that valuation, the Taste Elevation unit alone could be worth over $30 per Kraft Heinz share.

However, the North American Grocery unit is where the value case becomes more fragile. Even if it delivers $1.5+ billion in EBITDA, its brand portfolio includes commoditized and declining categories such as processed meats, powdered drinks, and shelf-stable cheese. The assumed 8.5x EBITDA multiple in bull cases may be too generouspeers like Conagra and Hormel's grocery segments trade closer to 79x, and in a bearish market environment, a 6x multiple is entirely possible. That could shrink its equity value to just $34 per share.

Put together, the sum-of-the-parts analysis supports a range of $2939 per share in post-spin valuation, versus Kraft Heinz's current ~$27 stock price. The upside is tangiblepotentially 3045% if peer multiples hold. But it is not guaranteed, and much of the re-rating depends on two factors: how investors value the slow-growth Grocery unit, and whether Taste Elevation can prove it truly deserves premium status in the food sector.

Importantly, this is not a classic value trap. The balance sheet is sound, the dividend appears sustainable, and cash generation remains robust. Guru investors like Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) and Prem Watsa (Trades, Portfolio) still hold sizable stakes, and some hedge funds have quietly accumulated sharessuggesting institutional patience. But it's also clear that insiders are not buying heavily, and that management must still prove this spin-off isn't just cosmetic.

In short, Kraft Heinz is evolving from a one-size-fits-all story into two targeted investment cases. For value investors with a 23 year horizon and appetite for moderate risk, this may be an attractive entry pointespecially with a 5.8% yield cushioning downside. For others, the next six quarters will be a test of management credibility, market sentiment, and execution precision.