Inizia

Analisi fondamentale

Discount to Net Asset ValueOverview This indicator helps investors and analysts identify when a company’s stock is trading below or above its intrinsic value. A persistent discount may highlight potential value opportunities, while a sustained premium could signal overvaluation or strong market sentiment. By visually shading the background and plotting the discount/premium percentage, users can quickly screen for undervalued stocks, confirm fundamental research, and make more informed buy or sell decisions. Usage Calculates the Net Asset Value discount (or premium) for any symbol. By default the indicator uses the current chart symbol’s TOTAL_ASSETS, TOTAL_LIABILITIES, and TOTAL_SHARES_OUTSTANDING. You can select another symbol by checking “Use Custom Symbol” and entering the ticker of the other symbol. This is useful for comparing the Discount to NAV across symbols. Shows the percentage discount (or premium) of market capitalization relative to net asset value. Recommended timeframes: daily bars or higher. Reporting Periods: • FQ = Fiscal Quarter • FY = Fiscal Year • TTM = Trailing Twelve Months Note: NAV is pulled on the chosen reporting period (FQ, FY, TTM). By default the background is shaded red to illustrate a discount to NAV and green to illustrate a premium to NAV. This can be toggled in the settings.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di quickshiftinn
Futures vs CFD Price Display 🎯 Trading the same asset in CFDs and Futures but tired of switching charts to compare prices? This is your indicator! Stop the constant chart hopping! This live price comparison shows you instantly where the better conditions are. ✨ What you get: Bidirectional: Works in both Futures AND CFD charts Live prices: Real-time comparison of both markets Spread calculation: Automatic difference in points and percentage Fully customizable: Colors, position, size to your liking Professional design: Clean display with symbol header 🎯 Perfect for: Gold traders (Futures vs CFD) Arbitrage strategies Spread monitoring Multi-broker comparisons ⚙️ Customization: 3 sizes (Small/Normal/Large) for all screens 4 positions available Individual color schemes Toggle features on/off 💡 Simply enter the symbol and keep both markets in sight! Notice: "Co-developed with Claude AI (Anthropic) - because even AI needs to pay the server bills! 😄"
Indicatore Pine Script®
di GoldenDayTrader
Session HighlightsCrypto relevant global equity market open/close indicator, high opacity background highlights follow the following color scheme & daily time ranges (times in EST): Orange: 8:00 PM to 9:30 PM (Sunday - Thursday): Japan/South Korea Yellow: 9:30 PM to +1D 4:00 AM (Sunday - Thursday): Hong Kong Aqua: 8:00 AM to 9:30 AM (Monday - Friday): US Premarket / Macro Data Release Blue: 9:30 AM to 4:00 PM (Monday - Friday): US White: 4:00 PM to +2D 6:00 PM (Friday - Sunday): Weekend *Market Holidays not accounted for
Indicatore Pine Script®
di bobbyjacowleff
NIFTY Option Buy Strategy MASTER v1This script is a complete option buying strategy framework for NIFTY, designed for both intraday and positional swing trades. 🔹 Built using multi-timeframe analysis (EMAs, MACD, RSI) 🔹 Combines key macro filters: India VIX, PCR, FII/DII net cash flows 🔹 Supports both Call (CE) and Put (PE) entries 🔹 Includes manual input dashboard for real-time market context 🔹 Trade logic includes: Bollinger Band breakouts Volume confirmation VWAP filtering EMA crossover + MACD alignment Resistance/support proximity from option chain (manual) 📈 Smart Trade Management: Multi-target system (e.g., exit 50% at RR=1, 50% at RR=2) Trailing stop-loss after target 1 hits Automatic exit on SL/TP or reverse signals Visual markers for all entries, exits, and stops 📊 Built-in Dashboard: Displays India VIX, PCR, FII/DII flows, and S/R levels Strike price selection (ATM + offset logic) 🧪 Ideal for backtesting, alerts, and real-time execution. Can be used with alerts + webhook for automated trading or signal generation. ⚠️ Note: This script is for educational purposes only. Always test on paper trading before going live.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di aman_ghadge698
COT-Index-NocTradingCOT Index Indicator The COT Index Indicator is a powerful tool designed to visualize the Commitment of Traders (COT) data and offer insights into market sentiment. The COT Index is a measurement of the relative positioning of commercial traders versus non-commercial and retail traders in the futures market. It is widely used to identify potential market reversals by observing the extremes in trader positioning. Customizable Timeframe: The indicator allows you to choose a custom time interval (in months) to visualize the COT data, making it flexible to fit different trading styles and strategies. How to Use: Visualize Market Sentiment: A COT Index near extremes (close to 0 or 100) can indicate potential turning points in the market, as it reflects extreme positioning of different market participant groups. Adjust the Time Interval: The ability to adjust the time interval (in months) gives traders the flexibility to analyze the market over different periods, which can be useful in detecting longer-term trends or short-term shifts in sentiment. Combine with Other Indicators: To enhance your analysis, combine the COT Index with your technical analysis. This tool can serve as an invaluable addition to your trading strategy, providing a deeper understanding of the market dynamics and the positioning of major market participants.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di NocTrading
PER Bands (Auto EPS)PER Bands Indicator - Technical Specification Function This PineScript v6 overlay indicator displays horizontal price bands based on Price-to-Earnings Ratio multiples. The indicator calculates price levels by multiplying earnings per share values by user-defined PER multiples, then plots these levels as horizontal lines on the chart. Data Sources The script attempts to automatically retrieve earnings per share data using TradingView's `request.financial()` function. The system first queries trailing twelve months EPS data, then annual EPS data if TTM is unavailable. When automatic retrieval fails or returns zero values, the indicator uses manually entered EPS values as a fallback. Configuration Options Users can configure five separate PER multiples (default values: 10x, 15x, 20x, 25x, 30x). Each band supports individual color customization and adjustable line width settings from 1 to 5 pixels. The indicator includes toggles for band visibility and optional fill areas between adjacent bands with 95% transparency. Visual Components The indicator plots five horizontal lines representing different PER valuation levels. Optional fill areas create colored zones between consecutive bands. A data table in the top-right corner displays current EPS source, EPS value, current PER ratio, and calculated price levels for each configured multiple. Calculation Method The indicator performs the following calculations: - Band Price = Current EPS × PER Multiple - Current PER = Current Price ÷ Current EPS These calculations update on each bar close using the most recent available EPS data. Alert System The script includes alert conditions for price crossovers above the lowest PER band and crossunders below the highest PER band. Additional alert conditions can be configured for any band level through the alert creation interface. Debug Features Debug mode displays character markers on the chart indicating when TTM or annual EPS data is available. This feature helps users verify which data source the indicator is using for calculations. Data Requirements The indicator requires positive, non-zero EPS values to function correctly. Stocks with negative earnings or zero EPS will display "N/A" for current PER calculations, though bands will still plot using the manual EPS input value. Exchange Compatibility Automatic EPS data availability varies by exchange. United States equity markets typically provide comprehensive fundamental data coverage. International markets may have limited automatic data availability, requiring manual EPS input for accurate calculations. Technical Limitations The indicator cannot fetch real-time EPS updates and relies on TradingView's fundamental data refresh schedule. Historical EPS changes are not reflected in past band positions, as the indicator uses current EPS values for all historical calculations. Display Settings The information table shows EPS source type (TTM Auto, Annual Auto, Manual, or Manual Fallback), allowing users to verify data accuracy. The table refreshes only on the last bar to optimize performance and reduce computational overhead. Code Structure Built using PineScript v6 syntax with proper scope management for plot and fill functions. The script uses global scope for all plot declarations and conditional logic within plot parameters to handle visibility settings. Version Requirements This indicator requires TradingView Pine Script version 6 or later due to the use of `request.financial()` functions and updated syntax requirements for plot titles and fill operations.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di hungryWhale69029
Advanced Petroleum Market Model (APMM)Advanced Petroleum Market Model (APMM): A Multi-Factor Fundamental Analysis Framework for Oil Market Assessment ## 1. Introduction The petroleum market represents one of the most complex and globally significant commodity markets, characterized by intricate supply-demand dynamics, geopolitical influences, and substantial price volatility (Hamilton, 2009). Traditional fundamental analysis approaches often struggle to synthesize the multitude of relevant indicators into actionable insights due to data heterogeneity, temporal misalignment, and subjective weighting schemes (Baumeister & Kilian, 2016). The Advanced Petroleum Market Model addresses these limitations through a systematic, quantitative approach that integrates 16 verified fundamental indicators across five critical market dimensions. The model builds upon established financial engineering principles while incorporating petroleum-specific market dynamics and adaptive learning mechanisms. ## 2. Theoretical Framework ### 2.1 Market Efficiency and Information Integration The model operates under the assumption of semi-strong market efficiency, where fundamental information is gradually incorporated into prices with varying degrees of lag (Fama, 1970). The petroleum market's unique characteristics, including storage costs, transportation constraints, and geopolitical risk premiums, create opportunities for fundamental analysis to provide predictive value (Kilian, 2009). ### 2.2 Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Theory Drawing from Ross's (1976) Arbitrage Pricing Theory, the model treats petroleum prices as driven by multiple systematic risk factors. The five-factor decomposition (Supply, Inventory, Demand, Trade, Sentiment) represents economically meaningful sources of systematic risk in petroleum markets (Chen et al., 1986). ## 3. Methodology ### 3.1 Data Sources and Quality Framework The model integrates 16 fundamental indicators sourced from verified TradingView economic data feeds: Supply Indicators: - US Oil Production (ECONOMICS:USCOP) - US Oil Rigs Count (ECONOMICS:USCOR) - API Crude Runs (ECONOMICS:USACR) Inventory Indicators: - US Crude Stock Changes (ECONOMICS:USCOSC) - Cushing Stocks (ECONOMICS:USCCOS) - API Crude Stocks (ECONOMICS:USCSC) - API Gasoline Stocks (ECONOMICS:USGS) - API Distillate Stocks (ECONOMICS:USDS) Demand Indicators: - Refinery Crude Runs (ECONOMICS:USRCR) - Gasoline Production (ECONOMICS:USGPRO) - Distillate Production (ECONOMICS:USDFP) - Industrial Production Index (FRED:INDPRO) Trade Indicators: - US Crude Imports (ECONOMICS:USCOI) - US Oil Exports (ECONOMICS:USOE) - API Crude Imports (ECONOMICS:USCI) - Dollar Index (TVC:DXY) Sentiment Indicators: - Oil Volatility Index (CBOE:OVX) ### 3.2 Data Quality Monitoring System Following best practices in quantitative finance (Lopez de Prado, 2018), the model implements comprehensive data quality monitoring: Data Quality Score = Σ(Individual Indicator Validity) / Total Indicators Where validity is determined by: - Non-null data availability - Positive value validation - Temporal consistency checks ### 3.3 Statistical Normalization Framework #### 3.3.1 Z-Score Normalization The model employs robust Z-score normalization as established by Sharpe (1994) for cross-indicator comparability: Z_i,t = (X_i,t - μ_i) / σ_i Where: - X_i,t = Raw value of indicator i at time t - μ_i = Sample mean of indicator i - σ_i = Sample standard deviation of indicator i Z-scores are capped at ±3 to mitigate outlier influence (Tukey, 1977). #### 3.3.2 Percentile Rank Transformation For intuitive interpretation, Z-scores are converted to percentile ranks following the methodology of Conover (1999): Percentile_Rank = (Number of values < current_value) / Total_observations × 100 ### 3.4 Exponential Smoothing Framework Signal smoothing employs exponential weighted moving averages (Brown, 1963) with adaptive alpha parameter: S_t = α × X_t + (1-α) × S_{t-1} Where α = 2/(N+1) and N represents the smoothing period. ### 3.5 Dynamic Threshold Optimization The model implements adaptive thresholds using Bollinger Band methodology (Bollinger, 1992): Dynamic_Threshold = μ ± (k × σ) Where k is the threshold multiplier adjusted for market volatility regime. ### 3.6 Composite Score Calculation The fundamental score integrates component scores through weighted averaging: Fundamental_Score = Σ(w_i × Score_i × Quality_i) Where: - w_i = Normalized component weight - Score_i = Component fundamental score - Quality_i = Data quality adjustment factor ## 4. Implementation Architecture ### 4.1 Adaptive Parameter Framework The model incorporates regime-specific adjustments based on market volatility: Volatility_Regime = σ_price / μ_price × 100 High volatility regimes (>25%) trigger enhanced weighting for inventory and sentiment components, reflecting increased market sensitivity to supply disruptions and psychological factors. ### 4.2 Data Synchronization Protocol Given varying publication frequencies (daily, weekly, monthly), the model employs forward-fill synchronization to maintain temporal alignment across all indicators. ### 4.3 Quality-Adjusted Scoring Component scores are adjusted for data quality to prevent degraded inputs from contaminating the composite signal: Adjusted_Score = Raw_Score × Quality_Factor + 50 × (1 - Quality_Factor) This formulation ensures that poor-quality data reverts toward neutral (50) rather than contributing noise. ## 5. Usage Guidelines and Best Practices ### 5.1 Configuration Recommendations For Short-term Analysis (1-4 weeks): - Lookback Period: 26 weeks - Smoothing Length: 3-5 periods - Confidence Period: 13 weeks - Increase inventory and sentiment weights For Medium-term Analysis (1-3 months): - Lookback Period: 52 weeks - Smoothing Length: 5-8 periods - Confidence Period: 26 weeks - Balanced component weights For Long-term Analysis (3+ months): - Lookback Period: 104 weeks - Smoothing Length: 8-12 periods - Confidence Period: 52 weeks - Increase supply and demand weights ### 5.2 Signal Interpretation Framework Bullish Signals (Score > 70): - Fundamental conditions favor price appreciation - Consider long positions or reduced short exposure - Monitor for trend confirmation across multiple timeframes Bearish Signals (Score < 30): - Fundamental conditions suggest price weakness - Consider short positions or reduced long exposure - Evaluate downside protection strategies Neutral Range (30-70): - Mixed fundamental environment - Favor range-bound or volatility strategies - Wait for clearer directional signals ### 5.3 Risk Management Considerations 1. Data Quality Monitoring: Continuously monitor the data quality dashboard. Scores below 75% warrant increased caution. 2. Regime Awareness: Adjust position sizing based on volatility regime indicators. High volatility periods require reduced exposure. 3. Correlation Analysis: Monitor correlation with crude oil prices to validate model effectiveness. 4. Fundamental-Technical Divergence: Pay attention when fundamental signals diverge from technical indicators, as this may signal regime changes. ### 5.4 Alert System Optimization Configure alerts conservatively to avoid false signals: - Set alert threshold at 75+ for high-confidence signals - Enable data quality warnings to maintain system integrity - Use trend reversal alerts for early regime change detection ## 6. Model Validation and Performance Metrics ### 6.1 Statistical Validation The model's statistical robustness is ensured through: - Out-of-sample testing protocols - Rolling window validation - Bootstrap confidence intervals - Regime-specific performance analysis ### 6.2 Economic Validation Fundamental accuracy is validated against: - Energy Information Administration (EIA) official reports - International Energy Agency (IEA) market assessments - Commercial inventory data verification ## 7. Limitations and Considerations ### 7.1 Model Limitations 1. Data Dependency: Model performance is contingent on data availability and quality from external sources. 2. US Market Focus: Primary data sources are US-centric, potentially limiting global applicability. 3. Lag Effects: Some fundamental indicators exhibit publication lags that may delay signal generation. 4. Regime Shifts: Structural market changes may require model recalibration. ### 7.2 Market Environment Considerations The model is optimized for normal market conditions. During extreme events (e.g., geopolitical crises, pandemics), additional qualitative factors should be considered alongside quantitative signals. ## References Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016). Forty years of oil price fluctuations: Why the price of oil may still surprise us. *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 30(1), 139-160. Bollinger, J. (1992). *Bollinger on Bollinger Bands*. McGraw-Hill. Brown, R. G. (1963). *Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction of Discrete Time Series*. Prentice-Hall. Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. *Journal of Business*, 59(3), 383-403. Conover, W. J. (1999). *Practical Nonparametric Statistics* (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. *Journal of Finance*, 25(2), 383-417. Hamilton, J. D. (2009). Understanding crude oil prices. *Energy Journal*, 30(2), 179-206. Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. *American Economic Review*, 99(3), 1053-1069. Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). *Advances in Financial Machine Learning*. John Wiley & Sons. Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. *Journal of Economic Theory*, 13(3), 341-360. Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe ratio. *Journal of Portfolio Management*, 21(1), 49-58. Tukey, J. W. (1977). *Exploratory Data Analysis*. Addison-Wesley.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di EdgeTools
BTC Thermocap Z-ScoreBTC Thermocap Indicator Overview The BTC Thermocap is a specialized on-chain ratio indicator designed to provide deeper insight into Bitcoin's market valuation relative to its cumulative issuance. By comparing the current market price of Bitcoin to the total value of all BTC ever mined (also known as "thermocap"), this indicator helps identify potential overvaluation or undervaluation periods within the Bitcoin market cycle. Key Features and Customizable Inputs: Moving Average Length (MA Length) Moving Average Type (MA Type) - SMA or EMA Z-Score Calculation Length Z-Score Toggle (Use Z-Score)
Indicatore Pine Script®
di QuantChook
Last Week's APM FX pairs only📖 Description: This script is designed for precision-focused forex traders who understand the power of volatility measurement. It calculates the Average Price Movement (APM) from the previous week by measuring the full wick-to-wick range (high to low) of each daily candle from Monday to Friday, then averaging them across the five sessions. 🔍 Core Features: ✅ Accurate APM Calculation: Pulls daily high-low ranges from last week using locked daily timeframe data, ensuring stable and reliable pip range measurements across all chart timeframes. ✅ Auto-Adjusts for Pip Precision: Detects whether the pair is JPY-based or not, and automatically adjusts the pip multiplier (100 for JPY pairs, 10,000 for all others) to give true pip values. ✅ Visual Display in Clean UI: The calculated APM is displayed in a non-intrusive, fixed-position table in the top-right corner of the chart — making it ideal for traders who want continuous awareness of recent market behavior without visual clutter. ✅ Timeless on Any Timeframe: Whether you’re on the 1-minute chart or the daily, the script remains anchored and accurate because it sources raw data from the daily chart internally. 📈 How It Helps Your Trading: 🧠 Volatility Awareness: Know how much a pair typically moves per day based on recent historical behavior — great for range analysis, target setting, or session biasing. 📊 Week-to-Week Comparison: Use it as a benchmark to compare current volatility to last week’s. Great for identifying if the market is expanding, contracting, or stabilizing. 🔗 Perfect for Confluence: APM can serve as a supporting metric when combined with order blocks, liquidity zones, news catalysts, or other volatility-based tools like ATR. 🛠️ Ideal For: Professional and prop firm traders Institutional model traders (ICT-style or SMC) Volatility scalpers and range-based intraday traders Anyone building a rules-based trading system with data-driven logic 🔐 Clean. Reliable. Focused. If you value structure, volatility awareness, and pip precision — this tool belongs in your chart workspace.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di delorean369
5-Day APM for Forex PairsThis script calculates the 5-Day Average Pip Movement (APM) for major Forex pairs. It displays the average daily range (in pips) over the past 5 trading days using true high-low price movement. The script is optimized for clarity and minimalism — showing a single floating label on the main chart for pairs like GBPUSD, USDJPY, EURUSD, etc. Automatically adjusts pip calculation for JPY pairs (×100) and other pairs (×10000). ✅ Great for identifying high-volatility vs low-volatility conditions ✅ Clean design with no clutter ✅ Only works on major FX pairs (whitelisted)
Indicatore Pine Script®
di delorean369
MVRV Ratio [Alpha Extract]The MVRV Ratio Indicator provides valuable insights into Bitcoin market cycles by tracking the relationship between market value and realized value. This powerful on-chain metric helps traders identify potential market tops and bottoms, offering clear buy and sell signals based on historical patterns of Bitcoin valuation. 🔶 CALCULATION The indicator processes MVRV ratio data through several analytical methods: Raw MVRV Data: Collects MVRV data directly from INTOTHEBLOCK for Bitcoin Optional Smoothing: Applies simple moving average (SMA) to reduce noise Status Classification: Categorizes market conditions into four distinct states Signal Generation: Produces trading signals based on MVRV thresholds Price Estimation: Calculates estimated realized price (Current price / MVRV ratio) Historical Context: Compares current values to historical extremes Formula: MVRV Ratio = Market Value / Realized Value Smoothed MVRV = SMA(MVRV Ratio, Smoothing Length) Estimated Realized Price = Current Price / MVRV Ratio Distance to Top = ((3.5 / MVRV Ratio) - 1) * 100 Distance to Bottom = ((MVRV Ratio / 0.8) - 1) * 100 🔶 DETAILS Visual Features: MVRV Plot: Color-coded line showing current MVRV value (red for overvalued, orange for moderately overvalued, blue for fair value, teal for undervalued) Reference Levels: Horizontal lines indicating key MVRV thresholds (3.5, 2.5, 1.0, 0.8) Zone Highlighting: Background color changes to highlight extreme market conditions (red for potentially overvalued, blue for potentially undervalued) Information Table: Comprehensive dashboard showing current MVRV value, market status, trading signal, price information, and historical context Interpretation: MVRV ≥ 3.5: Potential market top, strong sell signal MVRV ≥ 2.5: Overvalued market, consider selling MVRV 1.5-2.5: Neutral market conditions MVRV 1.0-1.5: Fair value, consider buying MVRV < 1.0: Potential market bottom, strong buy signal 🔶 EXAMPLES Market Top Identification: When MVRV ratio exceeds 3.5, the indicator signals potential market tops, highlighting periods where Bitcoin may be significantly overvalued. Example: During bull market peaks, MVRV exceeding 3.5 has historically preceded major corrections, helping traders time their exits. Bottom Detection: MVRV values below 1.0, especially approaching 0.8, have historically marked excellent buying opportunities. Example: During bear market bottoms, MVRV falling below 1.0 has identified the most profitable entry points for long-term Bitcoin accumulation. Tracking Market Cycles: The indicator provides a clear visualization of Bitcoin's market cycles from undervalued to overvalued states. Example: Following the progression of MVRV from below 1.0 through fair value and eventually to overvalued territory helps traders position themselves appropriately throughout Bitcoin's market cycle. Realized Price Support: The estimated realized price often acts as a significant support/resistance level during market transitions. Example: During corrections, price often finds support near the realized price level calculated by the indicator, providing potential entry points. 🔶 SETTINGS Customization Options: Smoothing: Toggle smoothing option and adjust smoothing length (1-50) Table Display: Show/hide the information table Table Position: Choose between top right, top left, bottom right, or bottom left positions Visual Elements: All plots, lines, and background highlights can be customized for color and style The MVRV Ratio Indicator provides traders with a powerful on-chain metric to identify potential market tops and bottoms in Bitcoin. By tracking the relationship between market value and realized value, this indicator helps identify periods of overvaluation and undervaluation, offering clear buy and sell signals based on historical patterns. The comprehensive information table delivers valuable context about current market conditions, helping traders make more informed decisions about market positioning throughout Bitcoin's cyclical patterns.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di AlphaExtract
Dr.Avinash Talele quarterly earnings, VCP and multibagger trakerDr. Avinash Talele Quarterly Earnings, VCP and Multibagger Tracker. 📊 Comprehensive Quarterly Analysis Tool for Multibagger Stock Discovery This advanced Pine Script indicator provides a complete financial snapshot directly on your chart, designed to help traders and investors identify potential multibagger stocks and VCP (Volatility Contraction Pattern) setups with precision. 🎯 Key Features: 📈 8-Quarter Financial Data Display: EPS (Earnings Per Share) - Track profitability trends Sales Revenue - Monitor business growth QoQ% (Quarter-over-Quarter Growth) - Spot acceleration/deceleration ROE (Return on Equity) - Assess management efficiency OPM (Operating Profit Margin) - Evaluate operational excellence 💰 Market Metrics: Market Cap - Current company valuation P/E Ratio - Valuation assessment Free Float - Liquidity indicator 📊 Technical Positioning: % Down from 52-Week High - Identify potential bottoming patterns % Up from 52-Week Low - Track momentum from lows Turnover Data (1D & 50D Average) - Volume analysis ADR% (Average Daily Range) - Volatility measurement Relative Volume% - Institutional interest indicator 🚀 How It Helps Find Multibaggers: 1. Growth Acceleration Detection: Consistent EPS Growth: Identifies companies with accelerating earnings Revenue Momentum: Tracks sales growth patterns quarter-over-quarter Margin Expansion: Spots improving operational efficiency through OPM trends 2. VCP Pattern Recognition: Volatility Contraction: ADR% helps identify tightening price ranges Volume Analysis: Relative volume shows institutional accumulation Distance from Highs: Tracks healthy pullbacks in uptrends 3. Fundamental Strength Validation: ROE Trends: Ensures management is efficiently using shareholder capital Debt-Free Growth: High ROE with growing margins indicates quality growth Scalability: Revenue growth vs. margin expansion analysis 4. Entry Timing Optimization: 52-Week Positioning: Enter near lows, avoid near highs Volume Confirmation: High relative volume confirms breakout potential Valuation Check: P/E ratio helps avoid overvalued entries 💡 Multibagger Characteristics to Look For: ✅ Consistent 15-20%+ EPS growth across multiple quarters ✅ Accelerating revenue growth with QoQ% improvements ✅ ROE above 15% and expanding ✅ Operating margins improving over time ✅ Low debt (indicated by high ROE with growing profits) ✅ Strong cash generation (reflected in consistent growth metrics) ✅ 20-40% down from 52-week highs (ideal entry zones) ✅ Above-average volume during consolidation phases 🎨 Visual Design: Clean white table with black borders for maximum readability Color-coded QoQ% changes (Green = Growth, Red = Decline) Centered positioning for easy chart analysis 8-quarter historical view for trend identification 📋 Perfect For: Long-term investors seeking multibagger opportunities Growth stock enthusiasts tracking earnings acceleration VCP pattern traders looking for breakout candidates Fundamental analysts requiring quick financial snapshots Swing traders timing entries in growth stocks ⚡ Quick Setup: Simply add the indicator to any NSE/BSE stock chart and instantly view comprehensive quarterly data. The table updates automatically with the latest financial information, making it perfect for screening and monitoring your watchlist. 🔍 Start identifying your next multibagger today with this powerful combination of fundamental analysis and technical positioning data! Disclaimer: This indicator is for educational and analysis purposes. Always conduct thorough research and consider risk management before making investment decisions.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di dravinashmedicaloncology
Smooth BTCSPL [GiudiceQuantico] – Dual Smoothed MAsSmooth BTCSPL – Dual Smoothed MAs What it measures • % of Bitcoin addresses in profit vs loss (on-chain tickers). • Spread = profit % − loss % → quick aggregate-sentiment gauge. • Optional alpha-decay normalisation ⇒ keeps the curve on a 0-1 scale across cycles. User inputs • Use Alpha-Decay Adjusted Input (true/false). • Fast MA – type (SMA / EMA / WMA / VWMA) & length (default 100). • Slow MA – type & length (default 200). • Colours – Bullish (#00ffbb) / Bearish (magenta). Computation flow 1. Fetch daily on-chain series. 2. Build raw spread. 3. If alpha-decay enabled: alpha = (rawSpread − 140-week rolling min) / (1 − rolling min). 4. Smooth chosen base with Fast & Slow MAs. 5. Bullish when Fast > Slow, bearish otherwise. 6. Bars tinted with the same bull/bear colour. How to read • Fast crosses above Slow → rising “addresses-in-profit” momentum → bullish bias. • Fast crosses below Slow → stress / capitulation risk. • Price-indicator divergences can flag exhaustion or hidden accumulation. Tips • Keep in a separate pane (overlay = false); bar-colouring still shows on price chart. • Shorter lengths for swing trades, longer for macro outlook. • Combine with funding rates, NUPL or simple price-MA crossovers for confirmation.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di GuidiceQuantico
Liquidity LinesLiquidity Lines Indicator This advanced TradingView indicator identifies key liquidity zones on your price chart by detecting bullish and bearish engulfing candles, which often signify areas where liquidity accumulates. It helps traders visually spot potential support and resistance levels created by market participants’ stop-loss orders or pending orders. Key Features : -Aggregated Bars Option : Smooth out price data by grouping bars together, enabling clearer liquidity zone identification on higher timeframes or noisy charts. -Upper Liquidity Lines : Displays dashed lines at recent highs where bearish engulfing patterns indicate potential resistance or supply zones. -Lower Liquidity Lines : Displays dashed lines at recent lows where bullish engulfing patterns suggest potential support or demand zones. -Customizable Colors : Choose your preferred colors for bullish (default black) and bearish (default white) liquidity lines for better visual distinction. -Automatic Line Cleanup : Maintains chart clarity by automatically removing old liquidity lines after a configurable limit. -Dynamic Alerts : Trigger alerts when price breaches upper or lower liquidity lines, signaling potential breakout or reversal opportunities. Use Cases :
Indicatore Pine Script®
di The_Forex_Steward
S&P 500 & Normalized CAPE Z-Score AnalyzerThis macro-focused indicator visualizes the historical valuation of the U.S. equity market using the CAPE ratio (Shiller P/E), normalized over its long-term average and standard deviations. It helps traders and investors identify overvaluation and undervaluation zones over time, combining both statistical signals and historical context. 💡 Why It’s Useful This indicator is ideal for macro traders and long-term investors looking to contextualize equity valuations across decades. It helps identify statistical extremes in valuation by referencing the standard deviation of the CAPE ratio relative to its long-term mean. The overlay of S&P 500 price with valuation zones provides a visual confirmation tool for macro decisions or timing insights. It includes: ✅ Three display modes: -S&P 500 (color-coded by CAPE valuation zone) -Normalized CAPE (vs. long-term mean) -CAPE Z-Score (standardized measure) 🎯 How to Interpret Dynamic coloring of the S&P 500 price based on CAPE valuation: 🔴 Z > +2σ → Highly Overvalued 🟠 Z > +1σ → Overvalued ⚪ -1σ < Z < +1σ → Neutral 🟢 Z < -1σ → Undervalued ✅ Z < -2σ → Strong Buy Zone -Live valuation label showing the current CAPE, Z-score, and zone. -Macro event shading: major historical events (e.g. Great Depression, Oil Crisis, Dot-com Bubble, COVID Crash) are shaded on the chart for context. ✅ Built-in alerts: CAPE > +2σ → Potential risk zone CAPE < -2σ → Potential opportunity zone 📊 Use Cases This indicator is ideal for: 🧠 Macro traders seeking long-term valuation extremes. 📈 Portfolio managers monitoring systemic valuation risk. 🏛️ Long-term investors timing strategic allocation shifts. 🧪 How It Works CAPE ratio (Shiller PE) is retrieved from Quandl (MULTPL/SHILLER_PE_RATIO_MONTH). The script calculates the long-term average and standard deviation of CAPE. The Z-score is computed as: (CAPE - Mean) / Standard Deviation Users can switch between: S&P 500 chart, color-coded by CAPE valuation zones. Normalized CAPE, centered around zero (historic mean). CAPE Z-score, showing statistical positioning directly. Visual bands represent +1σ, +2σ, -1σ, -2σ thresholds. You can switch between modes using the “Display” dropdown in the settings panel. 📊 Data Sources CAPE: MULTPL/SHILLER_PE_RATIO_MONTH via Quandl S&P 500: Monthly close prices of SPX (TradingView data) All data updated on monthly resolution This is not a repackaged built-in or autogenerated script. It’s a custom-built and interactive indicator designed for educational and analytical use in macroeconomic valuation studies.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di jtomasfg
Systemic Credit Market Pressure IndexSystemic Credit Market Pressure Index (SCMPI): A Composite Indicator for Credit Cycle Analysis The Systemic Credit Market Pressure Index (SCMPI) represents a novel composite indicator designed to quantify systemic stress within credit markets through the integration of multiple macroeconomic variables. This indicator employs advanced statistical normalization techniques, adaptive threshold mechanisms, and intelligent visualization systems to provide real-time assessment of credit market conditions across expansion, neutral, and stress regimes. The methodology combines credit spread analysis, labor market indicators, consumer credit conditions, and household debt metrics into a unified framework for systemic risk assessment, featuring dynamic Bollinger Band-style thresholds and theme-adaptive visualization capabilities. ## 1. Introduction Credit cycles represent fundamental drivers of economic fluctuations, with their dynamics significantly influencing financial stability and macroeconomic outcomes (Bernanke, Gertler & Gilchrist, 1999). The identification and measurement of credit market stress has become increasingly critical following the 2008 financial crisis, which highlighted the need for comprehensive early warning systems (Adrian & Brunnermeier, 2016). Traditional single-variable approaches often fail to capture the multidimensional nature of credit market dynamics, necessitating the development of composite indicators that integrate multiple information sources. The SCMPI addresses this gap by constructing a weighted composite index that synthesizes four key dimensions of credit market conditions: corporate credit spreads, labor market stress, consumer credit accessibility, and household leverage ratios. This approach aligns with the theoretical framework established by Minsky (1986) regarding financial instability hypothesis and builds upon empirical work by Gilchrist & Zakrajšek (2012) on credit market sentiment. ## 2. Theoretical Framework ### 2.1 Credit Cycle Theory The theoretical foundation of the SCMPI rests on the credit cycle literature, which posits that credit availability fluctuates in predictable patterns that amplify business cycle dynamics (Kiyotaki & Moore, 1997). During expansion phases, credit becomes increasingly available as risk perceptions decline and collateral values rise. Conversely, stress phases are characterized by credit contraction, elevated risk premiums, and deteriorating borrower conditions. The indicator incorporates Kindleberger's (1978) framework of financial crises, which identifies key stages in credit cycles: displacement, boom, euphoria, profit-taking, and panic. By monitoring multiple variables simultaneously, the SCMPI aims to capture transitions between these phases before they become apparent in individual metrics. ### 2.2 Systemic Risk Measurement Systemic risk, defined as the risk of collapse of an entire financial system or entire market (Kaufman & Scott, 2003), requires measurement approaches that capture interconnectedness and spillover effects. The SCMPI follows the methodology established by Bisias et al. (2012) in constructing composite measures that aggregate individual risk indicators into system-wide assessments. The index employs the concept of "financial stress" as defined by Illing & Liu (2006), encompassing increased uncertainty about fundamental asset values, increased uncertainty about other investors' behavior, increased flight to quality, and increased flight to liquidity. ## 3. Methodology ### 3.1 Component Variables The SCMPI integrates four primary components, each representing distinct aspects of credit market conditions: #### 3.1.1 Credit Spreads (BAA-10Y Treasury) Corporate credit spreads serve as the primary indicator of credit market stress, reflecting risk premiums demanded by investors for corporate debt relative to risk-free government securities (Gilchrist & Zakrajšek, 2012). The BAA-10Y spread specifically captures investment-grade corporate credit conditions, providing insight into broad credit market sentiment. #### 3.1.2 Unemployment Rate Labor market conditions directly influence credit quality through their impact on borrower repayment capacity (Bernanke & Gertler, 1995). Rising unemployment typically precedes credit deterioration, making it a valuable leading indicator for credit stress. #### 3.1.3 Consumer Credit Rates Consumer credit accessibility reflects the transmission of monetary policy and credit market conditions to household borrowing (Mishkin, 1995). Elevated consumer credit rates indicate tightening credit conditions and reduced credit availability for households. #### 3.1.4 Household Debt Service Ratio Household leverage ratios capture the debt burden relative to income, providing insight into household financial stress and potential credit losses (Mian & Sufi, 2014). High debt service ratios indicate vulnerable household sectors that may contribute to credit market instability. ### 3.2 Statistical Methodology #### 3.2.1 Z-Score Normalization Each component variable undergoes robust z-score normalization to ensure comparability across different scales and units: Z_i,t = (X_i,t - μ_i) / σ_i Where X_i,t represents the value of variable i at time t, μ_i is the historical mean, and σ_i is the historical standard deviation. The normalization period employs a rolling 252-day window to capture annual cyclical patterns while maintaining sensitivity to regime changes. #### 3.2.2 Adaptive Smoothing To reduce noise while preserving signal quality, the indicator employs exponential moving average (EMA) smoothing with adaptive parameters: EMA_t = α × Z_t + (1-α) × EMA_{t-1} Where α = 2/(n+1) and n represents the smoothing period (default: 63 days). #### 3.2.3 Weighted Aggregation The composite index combines normalized components using theoretically motivated weights: SCMPI_t = w_1×Z_spread,t + w_2×Z_unemployment,t + w_3×Z_consumer,t + w_4×Z_debt,t Default weights reflect the relative importance of each component based on empirical literature: credit spreads (35%), unemployment (25%), consumer credit (25%), and household debt (15%). ### 3.3 Dynamic Threshold Mechanism Unlike static threshold approaches, the SCMPI employs adaptive Bollinger Band-style thresholds that automatically adjust to changing market volatility and conditions (Bollinger, 2001): Expansion Threshold = μ_SCMPI - k × σ_SCMPI Stress Threshold = μ_SCMPI + k × σ_SCMPI Neutral Line = μ_SCMPI Where μ_SCMPI and σ_SCMPI represent the rolling mean and standard deviation of the composite index calculated over a configurable period (default: 126 days), and k is the threshold multiplier (default: 1.0). This approach ensures that thresholds remain relevant across different market regimes and volatility environments, providing more robust regime classification than fixed thresholds. ### 3.4 Visualization and User Interface The SCMPI incorporates advanced visualization capabilities designed for professional trading environments: #### 3.4.1 Adaptive Theme System The indicator features an intelligent dual-theme system that automatically optimizes colors and transparency levels for both dark and bright chart backgrounds. This ensures optimal readability across different trading platforms and user preferences. #### 3.4.2 Customizable Visual Elements Users can customize all visual aspects including: - Color Schemes: Automatic theme adaptation with optional custom color overrides - Line Styles: Configurable widths for main index, trend lines, and threshold boundaries - Transparency Optimization: Automatic adjustment based on selected theme for optimal contrast - Dynamic Zones: Color-coded regime areas with adaptive transparency #### 3.4.3 Professional Data Table A comprehensive 13-row data table provides real-time component analysis including: - Composite index value and regime classification - Individual component z-scores with color-coded stress indicators - Trend direction and signal strength assessment - Dynamic threshold status and volatility metrics - Component weight distribution for transparency ## 4. Regime Classification The SCMPI classifies credit market conditions into three distinct regimes: ### 4.1 Expansion Regime (SCMPI < Expansion Threshold) Characterized by favorable credit conditions, low risk premiums, and accommodative lending standards. This regime typically corresponds to economic expansion phases with low default rates and increasing credit availability. ### 4.2 Neutral Regime (Expansion Threshold ≤ SCMPI ≤ Stress Threshold) Represents balanced credit market conditions with moderate risk premiums and stable lending standards. This regime indicates neither significant stress nor excessive exuberance in credit markets. ### 4.3 Stress Regime (SCMPI > Stress Threshold) Indicates elevated credit market stress with high risk premiums, tightening lending standards, and deteriorating borrower conditions. This regime often precedes or coincides with economic contractions and financial market volatility. ## 5. Technical Implementation and Features ### 5.1 Alert System The SCMPI includes a comprehensive alert framework with seven distinct conditions: - Regime Transitions: Expansion, Neutral, and Stress phase entries - Extreme Conditions: Values exceeding ±2.0 standard deviations - Trend Reversals: Directional changes in the underlying trend component ### 5.2 Performance Optimization The indicator employs several optimization techniques: - Efficient Calculations: Pre-computed statistical measures to minimize computational overhead - Memory Management: Optimized variable declarations for real-time performance - Error Handling: Robust data validation and fallback mechanisms for missing data ## 6. Empirical Validation ### 6.1 Historical Performance Backtesting analysis demonstrates the SCMPI's ability to identify major credit stress episodes, including: - The 2008 Financial Crisis - The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic market disruption - Various regional banking crises - European sovereign debt crisis (2010-2012) ### 6.2 Leading Indicator Properties The composite nature and dynamic threshold system of the SCMPI provides enhanced leading indicator properties, typically signaling regime changes 1-3 months before they become apparent in individual components or market indices. The adaptive threshold mechanism reduces false signals during high-volatility periods while maintaining sensitivity during regime transitions. ## 7. Applications and Limitations ### 7.1 Applications - Risk Management: Portfolio managers can use SCMPI signals to adjust credit exposure and risk positioning - Academic Research: Researchers can employ the index for credit cycle analysis and systemic risk studies - Trading Systems: The comprehensive alert system enables automated trading strategy implementation - Financial Education: The transparent methodology and visual design facilitate understanding of credit market dynamics ### 7.2 Limitations - Data Dependency: The indicator relies on timely and accurate macroeconomic data from FRED sources - Regime Persistence: Dynamic thresholds may exhibit brief lag during extremely rapid regime transitions - Model Risk: Component weights and parameters require periodic recalibration based on evolving market structures - Computational Requirements: Real-time calculations may require adequate processing power for optimal performance ## References Adrian, T. & Brunnermeier, M.K. (2016). CoVaR. *American Economic Review*, 106(7), 1705-1741. Bernanke, B. & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the black box: the credit channel of monetary policy transmission. *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 9(4), 27-48. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M. & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. *Handbook of Macroeconomics*, 1, 1341-1393. Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A.W. & Valavanis, S. (2012). A survey of systemic risk analytics. *Annual Review of Financial Economics*, 4(1), 255-296. Bollinger, J. (2001). *Bollinger on Bollinger Bands*. McGraw-Hill Education. Gilchrist, S. & Zakrajšek, E. (2012). Credit spreads and business cycle fluctuations. *American Economic Review*, 102(4), 1692-1720. Illing, M. & Liu, Y. (2006). Measuring financial stress in a developed country: An application to Canada. *Journal of Financial Stability*, 2(3), 243-265. Kaufman, G.G. & Scott, K.E. (2003). What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? *The Independent Review*, 7(3), 371-391. Kindleberger, C.P. (1978). *Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises*. Basic Books. Kiyotaki, N. & Moore, J. (1997). Credit cycles. *Journal of Political Economy*, 105(2), 211-248. Mian, A. & Sufi, A. (2014). What explains the 2007–2009 drop in employment? *Econometrica*, 82(6), 2197-2223. Minsky, H.P. (1986). *Stabilizing an Unstable Economy*. Yale University Press. Mishkin, F.S. (1995). Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 9(4), 3-10.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di EdgeTools
Bear Market Probability Model# Bear Market Probability Model: A Multi-Factor Risk Assessment Framework The Bear Market Probability Model represents a comprehensive quantitative framework for assessing systemic market risk through the integration of 13 distinct risk factors across four analytical categories: macroeconomic indicators, technical analysis factors, market sentiment measures, and market breadth metrics. This indicator synthesizes established financial research methodologies to provide real-time probabilistic assessments of impending bear market conditions, offering institutional-grade risk management capabilities to retail and professional traders alike. ## Theoretical Foundation ### Historical Context of Bear Market Prediction Bear market prediction has been a central focus of financial research since the seminal work of Dow (1901) and the subsequent development of technical analysis theory. The challenge of predicting market downturns gained renewed academic attention following the market crashes of 1929, 1987, 2000, and 2008, leading to the development of sophisticated multi-factor models. Fama and French (1989) demonstrated that certain financial variables possess predictive power for stock returns, particularly during market stress periods. Their three-factor model laid the groundwork for multi-dimensional risk assessment, which this indicator extends through the incorporation of real-time market microstructure data. ### Methodological Framework The model employs a weighted composite scoring methodology based on the theoretical framework established by Campbell and Shiller (1998) for market valuation assessment, extended through the incorporation of high-frequency sentiment and technical indicators as proposed by Baker and Wurgler (2006) in their seminal work on investor sentiment. The mathematical foundation follows the general form: Bear Market Probability = Σ(Wi × Ci) / ΣWi × 100 Where: - Wi = Category weight (i = 1,2,3,4) - Ci = Normalized category score - Categories: Macroeconomic, Technical, Sentiment, Breadth ## Component Analysis ### 1. Macroeconomic Risk Factors #### Yield Curve Analysis The inclusion of yield curve inversion as a primary predictor follows extensive research by Estrella and Mishkin (1998), who demonstrated that the term spread between 3-month and 10-year Treasury securities has historically preceded all major recessions since 1969. The model incorporates both the 2Y-10Y and 3M-10Y spreads to capture different aspects of monetary policy expectations. Implementation: - 2Y-10Y Spread: Captures market expectations of monetary policy trajectory - 3M-10Y Spread: Traditional recession predictor with 12-18 month lead time Scientific Basis: Harvey (1988) and subsequent research by Ang, Piazzesi, and Wei (2006) established the theoretical foundation linking yield curve inversions to economic contractions through the expectations hypothesis of the term structure. #### Credit Risk Premium Assessment High-yield credit spreads serve as a real-time gauge of systemic risk, following the methodology established by Gilchrist and Zakrajšek (2012) in their excess bond premium research. The model incorporates the ICE BofA High Yield Master II Option-Adjusted Spread as a proxy for credit market stress. Threshold Calibration: - Normal conditions: < 350 basis points - Elevated risk: 350-500 basis points - Severe stress: > 500 basis points #### Currency and Commodity Stress Indicators The US Dollar Index (DXY) momentum serves as a risk-off indicator, while the Gold-to-Oil ratio captures commodity market stress dynamics. This approach follows the methodology of Akram (2009) and Beckmann, Berger, and Czudaj (2015) in analyzing commodity-currency relationships during market stress. ### 2. Technical Analysis Factors #### Multi-Timeframe Moving Average Analysis The technical component incorporates the well-established moving average convergence methodology, drawing from the work of Brock, Lakonishok, and LeBaron (1992), who provided empirical evidence for the profitability of technical trading rules. Implementation: - Price relative to 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages - Moving average convergence/divergence analysis - Multi-timeframe MACD assessment (daily and weekly) #### Momentum and Volatility Analysis The model integrates Relative Strength Index (RSI) analysis following Wilder's (1978) original methodology, combined with maximum drawdown analysis based on the work of Magdon-Ismail and Atiya (2004) on optimal drawdown measurement. ### 3. Market Sentiment Factors #### Volatility Index Analysis The VIX component follows the established research of Whaley (2009) and subsequent work by Bekaert and Hoerova (2014) on VIX as a predictor of market stress. The model incorporates both absolute VIX levels and relative VIX spikes compared to the 20-day moving average. Calibration: - Low volatility: VIX < 20 - Elevated concern: VIX 20-25 - High fear: VIX > 25 - Panic conditions: VIX > 30 #### Put-Call Ratio Analysis Options flow analysis through put-call ratios provides insight into sophisticated investor positioning, following the methodology established by Pan and Poteshman (2006) in their analysis of informed trading in options markets. ### 4. Market Breadth Factors #### Advance-Decline Analysis Market breadth assessment follows the classic work of Fosback (1976) and subsequent research by Brown and Cliff (2004) on market breadth as a predictor of future returns. Components: - Daily advance-decline ratio - Advance-decline line momentum - McClellan Oscillator (Ema19 - Ema39 of A-D difference) #### New Highs-New Lows Analysis The new highs-new lows ratio serves as a market leadership indicator, based on the research of Zweig (1986) and validated in academic literature by Zarowin (1990). ## Dynamic Threshold Methodology The model incorporates adaptive thresholds based on rolling volatility and trend analysis, following the methodology established by Pagan and Sossounov (2003) for business cycle dating. This approach allows the model to adjust sensitivity based on prevailing market conditions. Dynamic Threshold Calculation: - Warning Level: Base threshold ± (Volatility × 1.0) - Danger Level: Base threshold ± (Volatility × 1.5) - Bounds: ±10-20 points from base threshold ## Professional Implementation ### Institutional Usage Patterns Professional risk managers typically employ multi-factor bear market models in several contexts: #### 1. Portfolio Risk Management - Tactical Asset Allocation: Reducing equity exposure when probability exceeds 60-70% - Hedging Strategies: Implementing protective puts or VIX calls when warning thresholds are breached - Sector Rotation: Shifting from growth to defensive sectors during elevated risk periods #### 2. Risk Budgeting - Value-at-Risk Adjustment: Incorporating bear market probability into VaR calculations - Stress Testing: Using probability levels to calibrate stress test scenarios - Capital Requirements: Adjusting regulatory capital based on systemic risk assessment #### 3. Client Communication - Risk Reporting: Quantifying market risk for client presentations - Investment Committee Decisions: Providing objective risk metrics for strategic decisions - Performance Attribution: Explaining defensive positioning during market stress ### Implementation Framework Professional traders typically implement such models through: #### Signal Hierarchy: 1. Probability < 30%: Normal risk positioning 2. Probability 30-50%: Increased hedging, reduced leverage 3. Probability 50-70%: Defensive positioning, cash building 4. Probability > 70%: Maximum defensive posture, short exposure consideration #### Risk Management Integration: - Position Sizing: Inverse relationship between probability and position size - Stop-Loss Adjustment: Tighter stops during elevated risk periods - Correlation Monitoring: Increased attention to cross-asset correlations ## Strengths and Advantages ### 1. Comprehensive Coverage The model's primary strength lies in its multi-dimensional approach, avoiding the single-factor bias that has historically plagued market timing models. By incorporating macroeconomic, technical, sentiment, and breadth factors, the model provides robust risk assessment across different market regimes. ### 2. Dynamic Adaptability The adaptive threshold mechanism allows the model to adjust sensitivity based on prevailing volatility conditions, reducing false signals during low-volatility periods and maintaining sensitivity during high-volatility regimes. ### 3. Real-Time Processing Unlike traditional academic models that rely on monthly or quarterly data, this indicator processes daily market data, providing timely risk assessment for active portfolio management. ### 4. Transparency and Interpretability The component-based structure allows users to understand which factors are driving risk assessment, enabling informed decision-making about model signals. ### 5. Historical Validation Each component has been validated in academic literature, providing theoretical foundation for the model's predictive power. ## Limitations and Weaknesses ### 1. Data Dependencies The model's effectiveness depends heavily on the availability and quality of real-time economic data. Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) updates may have lags that could impact model responsiveness during rapidly evolving market conditions. ### 2. Regime Change Sensitivity Like most quantitative models, the indicator may struggle during unprecedented market conditions or structural regime changes where historical relationships break down (Taleb, 2007). ### 3. False Signal Risk Multi-factor models inherently face the challenge of balancing sensitivity with specificity. The model may generate false positive signals during normal market volatility periods. ### 4. Currency and Geographic Bias The model focuses primarily on US market indicators, potentially limiting its effectiveness for global portfolio management or non-USD denominated assets. ### 5. Correlation Breakdown During extreme market stress, correlations between risk factors may increase dramatically, reducing the model's diversification benefits (Forbes and Rigobon, 2002). ## References Akram, Q. F. (2009). Commodity prices, interest rates and the dollar. Energy Economics, 31(6), 838-851. Ang, A., Piazzesi, M., & Wei, M. (2006). What does the yield curve tell us about GDP growth? Journal of Econometrics, 131(1-2), 359-403. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292. Beckmann, J., Berger, T., & Czudaj, R. (2015). Does gold act as a hedge or a safe haven for stocks? A smooth transition approach. Economic Modelling, 48, 16-24. Bekaert, G., & Hoerova, M. (2014). The VIX, the variance premium and stock market volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 183(2), 181-192. Brock, W., Lakonishok, J., & LeBaron, B. (1992). Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1731-1764. Brown, G. W., & Cliff, M. T. (2004). Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 1-27. Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1998). Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(2), 11-26. Dow, C. H. (1901). Scientific stock speculation. The Magazine of Wall Street. Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F. S. (1998). Predicting US recessions: Financial variables as leading indicators. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 45-61. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1989). Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23-49. Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223-2261. Fosback, N. G. (1976). Stock market logic: A sophisticated approach to profits on Wall Street. The Institute for Econometric Research. Gilchrist, S., & Zakrajšek, E. (2012). Credit spreads and business cycle fluctuations. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1692-1720. Harvey, C. R. (1988). The real term structure and consumption growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(2), 305-333. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. Magdon-Ismail, M., & Atiya, A. F. (2004). Maximum drawdown. Risk, 17(10), 99-102. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. Pagan, A. R., & Sossounov, K. A. (2003). A simple framework for analysing bull and bear markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 23-46. Pan, J., & Poteshman, A. M. (2006). The information in option volume for future stock prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(3), 871-908. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House. Whaley, R. E. (2009). Understanding the VIX. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(3), 98-105. Wilder, J. W. (1978). New concepts in technical trading systems. Trend Research. Zarowin, P. (1990). Size, seasonality, and stock market overreaction. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(1), 113-125. Zweig, M. E. (1986). Winning on Wall Street. Warner Books.
Indicatore Pine Script®
di EdgeTools
11