Bitcoin to C. Model A, B, C, D, E. Prediction Modeling Part 7.
Aggiornato
This is a continuation thread of the theoretical geometric linear regression from 3.22.18. The modeling sequence starts at; Model A, transitions to Model B, transitions to Model C, transitions to Model D and now we have reached Model E.. Each model is strictly built off of the preceding models geometric regression points. The regression points from each model, creates a geometric pattern of indicators, that can be read to PREDICT future trend movement, before actual traditional indicators occur.
I have decided to explain each move I make regarding my theoretical modeling technique. This is part 7.. We are now incorporating AT THE END OF MODEL SEQUENCE LIMITS. This is a huge deal. This is make it or break it time. A sequence ending zone.. is a massive convergence point.. where all the models converge into one vector of space. This is the vector space we are in now.. All geometric indicators show massive upward motion in the background noise. Let us see if this holds true, or we have modeling sequence failure..
In my personal opinion I think something big is about to happen. But i will most likely be wrong... but what if i am not..
Red Bubbles = the past.
Blue Bubbles = Now + the predicted future.
Statistical Outliers = Emotions + and/or Market Manipulation.
I am going to try my best to explain, as we go... There will be lots of bubbles with text, explaining each move and why.. and how i make prediction cones, and patterns using geometric boundary lines and regression modeling.
This is A FULLY EXPERIMENTAL MODEL. Take it for what it is worth. I will continue to make these charts regardless of comments or jabs. They are made for a specific purpose and until my purpose is fulfilled, they will keep being made.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas..
I like going against the norm.. being different is what makes you stand out.. So stand out from the rest..
So, watch what I do.. Ask questions, I will try my best to answer them.. if you are confused on how I got to Model A, B, C, D, E already. Skim thru my old charts start from 3.22.18. It is about modeling sequencing, and appropriate modeling coherence.
I want to try this different approach, to expressing myself in this realm.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
I have decided to explain each move I make regarding my theoretical modeling technique. This is part 7.. We are now incorporating AT THE END OF MODEL SEQUENCE LIMITS. This is a huge deal. This is make it or break it time. A sequence ending zone.. is a massive convergence point.. where all the models converge into one vector of space. This is the vector space we are in now.. All geometric indicators show massive upward motion in the background noise. Let us see if this holds true, or we have modeling sequence failure..
In my personal opinion I think something big is about to happen. But i will most likely be wrong... but what if i am not..
Red Bubbles = the past.
Blue Bubbles = Now + the predicted future.
Statistical Outliers = Emotions + and/or Market Manipulation.
I am going to try my best to explain, as we go... There will be lots of bubbles with text, explaining each move and why.. and how i make prediction cones, and patterns using geometric boundary lines and regression modeling.
This is A FULLY EXPERIMENTAL MODEL. Take it for what it is worth. I will continue to make these charts regardless of comments or jabs. They are made for a specific purpose and until my purpose is fulfilled, they will keep being made.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas..
I like going against the norm.. being different is what makes you stand out.. So stand out from the rest..
So, watch what I do.. Ask questions, I will try my best to answer them.. if you are confused on how I got to Model A, B, C, D, E already. Skim thru my old charts start from 3.22.18. It is about modeling sequencing, and appropriate modeling coherence.
I want to try this different approach, to expressing myself in this realm.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Nota
closer look. Nota
Oh man.. it looks like the entire model sequence is reaching its prediction boundary limits.. Model C prediction Line + Model A, B, C, D, E connect line and our current outlier trend is between the two yellow Model Lines..
WE MUST ENTER MODEL E to stay true to the modeling sequence... we are getting very close to having a model E failure, which would possible fail the entire modeling sequence.. As each model is precursor to the next model..
We have to see some insane movement, or this prediction model will fail...
I planned for it to fail at some point.. This may be the point.. or will we get the surprise of our lives.. and work our way up the modeling prediction cones...
Stay tuned....
Thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Nota
holyyyyy sheet this is cutting it close..... i really do not think this is going to work.... reaching boundary limit.. Nota
THE SUSPENSE!... 0_o fly little blue bubbled dude! FLY! you got this!Nota
(bites nails nervously).... not much i can do at this point but wait.. Nota
ya... the chances are so slim that.. like.. i am already trying to figure out how to improve my next modeling sequence... oh well.. lets see what these final minutes hold.. or to see if there is a better modeling of fit for the regression model...Nota
probability % of success is less than 1%. :(... Nota
probability % of success = 0.5% Critical failure ?...
Nota
MASSIVE...... EVERY CONVERGENCE VECTOR IN THE ENTIRE MODELING SEQUENCE LED TO A DROP. I read the chart completely wrong.. i should of been expecting that drop... The indicators were right not wrong..
I WAS WRONG, because i did not read the indicators correctly. Model C prediction line + Line connect for Models A, B, C, D, E made a extreme boundary line.. This was a guarenteed path.. I just did not read it correctly..
Model F, has formed completely. A bat formation...
Nota
This might just work... Nota
This is such a crazy learning process.. Vector convergence that points inward may = DROP?
Vector convergence that fans away may = RISE?
Not sure if i said that right, but i notice that any tight convergence in the ENTIRE modeling sequence, indicated a drop..
Any fanning convergence in the ENTIRE modeling sequences, indicated a rise..
Not sure if these rules will stay true, but something that i noticed and NEED to take note of.
Nota
It is a guessing game now.. Nota
are you a fluke Mr. Pump?? or legit?..Nota
The big picture... Sorry i was not about to re-position the entire model sequence worth of Bubbles. 
Pubblicazioni correlate
Declinazione di responsabilità
Le informazioni ed i contenuti pubblicati non costituiscono in alcun modo una sollecitazione ad investire o ad operare nei mercati finanziari. Non sono inoltre fornite o supportate da TradingView. Maggiori dettagli nelle Condizioni d'uso.